Saturday, July 25, 2015

Golden Era of Indian Cinema


Indian Cinema has come of an age and that’s only an understatement. For a person who has been bought up on regressive Indian Cinema of the 90s, the new era now is like a breath of fresh air. This era is that of Imtiaz Ali, Anurag Kashyap, Vishal Bharadwaj, Vinkramaditya Motwani, S Rajmouli, Anand Rai and many more associated with them. Its almost a team which is out there to make Cinema the way it is supposed to be. The depth and the range that never existed is now there to be seen.  From a cricketing analogy, this seems to be era between 1996 and 2011 when the likes of Sachin, Saurav, Rahul, VVS, Kumble played who encouraged the Yuvis, Bhajjis, Shewags, the Dhonis. Indian Cinema has clearly entered the same phase.

I shall talk about 3 recent releases which are so different from each other and yet if you have to find something common in them is the excellence with which these 3 stories were pursued and executed. I discuss them in the order of their releases in India and not necessarily any other order of preference.


TANU WEDS MANU RETURNS
 “Hum thode Bewafa kya nikale… Aap toh badchalan ho gaye”.  Clearly the movie was made over the top. Anand Rai who had earlier made Ranjhanaa too understands the mass sensibilities so well and plays the films for the masses. Yet the movie is so different from the 200-300 Crore films. The screenplay that allows the characters to be developed and then they playing over the top would not have been easy but with the two recent movies, Anand Rai shows how even an entertaining film can be executed. No item numbers were required because the film’s characters are itself an item number. Coming from the heart land of India- Kanpur, Delhi, Punjab, the movie celebrates smart dialogues, the changing  and many times conflicting social values. Films need not be senseless to be entertaining is what Anand Rai so effectively portrays in his movies. That he got an actress like Kangana who herself brings that liberating spirit to the table, exponentially enhanced the effect of the film.


BAHUBALI
What more can be said about that has already not said. Films to many, like me, are not only about substance but is an larger than life spectacle. Irrespective of the genre of the film being made, I believe the reason that a film is to be made is because the filmmaker believes that a story is to be told. More often than not, filmmakers in India try and make a spectacle and then try and base the story around that spectacle. The spectacle could be a big star or in some case CGI. CGI does not need a story….. The story telling might need CGI. Bahubali passes this litmus test. The story was there and it need a scale. S Rajamouli should be complimented as a story teller and as a project manager. He succeded not only in the art of story telling but ensure that a project of this scale was executed to perfection. The result of was a spectale which help its audience to their seats for more than 150mins and the quest is for more is not done with. Bahubali, in true sense of the word, is larger than life and yet a story that connects the sensibilities of human race to core.


MASAAN
“A celebration  of Life and Death and everything in between” said the poster of Masaan. To my surprise the movie was exactly what it promised.  Unlike, Bahubali and Tanu weds Manu, this by that definition for a non filmy film. It’s a film with layers. Christopher Nolan is the film maker that comes to mind when you discuss about films with layers. “The Drark Knight” was a film which both a child and an intellect will like for reasons of their own…. Both interpreting the movie the way they want to. This movie has many layers and much has been left to the imagination of audience. I like it. I like when a filmmaker respects the intelligence of its audience. The movie shows life in Benaras, the way it is. It is the audience which interprets it the way it wants so much life the real life.

I was particularly hurt by a small scene when they at the Harishchandra Ghat of Benaras where the bodies were being cremated. Some one in the background shouts for the skull to be broken. Let me explain this ritual.  A few minutes after the body  has been consigned to the flames, Kapal Kriya is performed. In this, one of the longer bamboos used in the Arthi is used to break the skull of the body. This is done by the person doing the cremation. Forehead is where the soul of the dead is supposed to be concentrated. Once broken, the soul is freed from the body and starts the search for the next body. I performed these rites almost 5 years back. It is by far the most painful duty that I have performed as a human. It sends shivers down my spine even now. That highly soul shattering experience, is shown as a casual shot in the film. I am sure many might have missed it. I am sure the purpose of the shot was the effect that it left on it. To show how such soul shattering experiences which a person like me cannot forget for 5 years now,  is the life of “Doms” of Kashi. The lead actor of the movie wants to escape the place and lead a good life. Those aspirations were more than justified with that one shot. The movie has many such experiences. It’s a movie that wont leave you for a long time.




In conclusion, it is clear that the three movie which have been released within months of each other have raised the bar of Indian Cinema across genres. While Tanu Weds Manu Returns and Bahubali are over the top, larger than life films, Masaan is story of life and death. It has substance. Our filmmakers have delivered them to their audience exactly the way they are meant to be  served. Its true that we still do not have a Quentin Tarintinos , the Christopher Nolans, the Martin Scorsese , the Steven Spillbergs, the James Cameroons as yet. But the new breed of film makers are not very far off. They can deliver is proven. This is clearly by far the Golden era of Indian Cinema.  The only question now to be asked to our film makers is …. Can they dream. The film  industry is after all an industry of dreams.


Saturday, July 4, 2015

Tilak and Jinnah

I happened to the a Marathi Movie that released earlier this year called "Tilak: Ek Yugpurush". A fantastically made movie clearly shook me from inside. The movie and the quest to understand the Indian Freedom movement made me do a bit of research for myself. Let me share some things I found. 

Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak first leader of the Indian Independence Movement. The British colonial authorities called him "Father of the Indian unrest." He was also conferred with the honorary title of "Lokmanya", which literally means "accepted by the people (as their leader)".

Tilak was one of the first and strongest advocates of "Swaraj" (self-rule) and a strong radical in Indian consciousness. He is known for his quote in Marathi, "स्वराज्य हा माझा जन्मसिद्ध हक्क आहे आणि तो मी मिळवणारच" ("Swarajya is my birthright, and I shall have it!") in India. Not many people know this but he formed a close alliance with Muhammad Ali Jinnah, later the founder of Pakistan, during the Indian Home Rule Movement.

Just outside the grand, wood-panelled Central Court in Mumbai High court stands a marble tablet with these lines inscribed in stone: “In spite of the verdict of the Jury, I maintain that I am innocent. There are higher powers that rule the destiny of men and nations and it may be the will of providence that the cause which I represent may prosper more by my suffering than my remaining free.”

Tilak was tried on three occasions by the Bombay High Court, for inflammatory speeches and sedition. On one occasion — the occasion on which Tilak spoke those line — his defence lawyer was Muhammad Ali Jinnah. In 1916, Jinnah defended Tilak when he was charged with sedition, ultimately securing his acquittal. 

Jinnah's commitment to Indian freedom was in many ways formed by his relations with Tilak and another Indian National Congress leader, Gopal Krishna Gokhale.

Images of mighty historical figures often circulate as fond stereotypes — good, bad and ugly. They also have the power of indoctrinating society into believing that they are inviolable. If Tilak is routinely identified with his “Swaraj is my birthright” assertion, Jinnah is invariably hailed as the creator of Pakistan. 


Scholars and the public at large in both India and Pakistan need to revisit Jinnah's person and political legacy in an attempt to better understand this region's history.  It is important for Indians to reclaim Jinnah as a freedom fighter and integral figure in our own history, while Pakistanis need to acknowledge that the founder of their nation made some mistakes.


I am sure I cannot and shall not stop here. The quest to know what and how the ugliest divorce (India- Pakistan Partition) in the history of mankind took place cannot end here. The answer, I am sure, cannot be in black and white, as the history  taught to us in India would like us to believe.